Skip navigation

Monthly Archives: March 2009

While my first point grabbed your attention and my second is a compulsory part of modern life, it’s the third obscenity that is the controversial one; at this particular point in time.

Sex has always been around, we wouldn’t exist without it.

Lies were found to be useful in the Garden of Eden.

Internet filters, on the other hand, have yet to be proven a good or bad thing and more to the point, a connection to the ability to know the difference between good and evil. Now while no decent person would object to spam being ejected from our daily electronic discourse, those who would censor free speech are a scourge who camouflage themselves as purveyors of morality. I don’t know about you, but I think the Chinese governments’ track record of riding rough shot over their characterized google-ing ability and their you tubing, voyeuristic, human right is a travesty of international proportions.

Nothing said here breaches the stable datum of current thinking but if I venture to say, or comment upon Australia’s preoccupation with becoming the world’s most filtered consumers of digitalized porridge, then no doubt I would raise the hackles of many a social guardian. Never the less, thoughtful, law abiding and erect citizens of our great nation take heed; because if you go down to the woods today be sure of a big surprise, tomorrow a powerful elite of bureaucratic wolves will be in charge of you children’s future and there will be no governing them.

DON’T confuse a minority of sexual degenerates with the somewhat maligned, outspoken dissidents who, rightly or wrongly, criticize the dem-mock-rat-ically elected ruling class because in the end they maybe putting their freedoms on the line for your rights.


Spare the rod, spoil the child; hang the bastards; nuke ‘em all. These terms have had their day to all but the uneducated, mean-spirited, right-wing ass-holes. They don’t represent anything but an intolerant, outdated, failure of policy but still we are surrounded by well meaning people who haven’t managed to associated their way of thinking and speaking to the verifiable error of pursuing the hard line. So here I go again with a rant aimed at begging some to change their view, even if it is totally foreign to their regular habit.

Catholics, Jews and Muslims, God bless their souls, are, by their own admition, victims of their chosen religion in the ‘guilt’ department. If all was fair and equitable in the church, as well as more secular concerns, changes of policy would have kept pace with common knowledge. So all have become victims of the slow pace of change, in the sense that those who feel it is their godly duty to condemn sinners to the fiery pits suffer as well as those they judge. Red necked, pro- 911- retribution advocates sit squarely with terrorists and the financial neo-cons as world opinion swings decisively away from their bad judgements, extreme reactions and poor results.

Nothing I have said here comes as a revelatory cognition, we all know it. Why I have chosen to pontificate on this subject comes from a personal realization that if you treat people badly they react badly. If you offer people respect and understanding, you see the best come from the worst, no matter what the percentage; don’t take my word for it, try it for yourself. If you want to see your children grow and mature as responsible adults, invest in giving them the space to act like responsible adults. If you want to see criminals or terrorists act in away that you would desire , try treating them in a similar way and you might just be surprised at the results.

I have seen the nicest, most well intentioned, honestly godly people turn into the nastiest, mean spirited, old devils that we all are glad to see the back of, for the lack of understanding this issue. Don’t propagate the trend.